Articles

Global learning measurement systems such as Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), and Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) have been widely used to compare the educational performance of different countries. However, these systems have some limitations that need to be considered. After analyzing 1,265 research articles on such measurement agendas, this article highlights blind spots and blackspots surrounding largescale metrics’ development, measurement, and implications. This commentary article emphasizes that essential factors about culture and diversity have yet to be included in such metrics, leading to monochrome paintings of the global education landscape rather than mosaics. Overall, we advocate for a strategic shift in developing and adopting such global measurement agendas.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of games and simulations on the academic achievement of secondary school students in mathematics. Employing a quasi-experimental design, the study utilized both an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG) to assess the effectiveness of games and simulations in learning mathematics. A total of 62 grade nine students participated. The EG was exposed to quiz games, problem-solving games, polyprod games, and PhET simulations for teaching polynomials, while the CG followed traditional teaching methods. Data were collected using mathematics achievement test scores and a survey questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The findings indicated that students had positive perceptions of using games and simulations in learning mathematics, with an overall mean score (M = 4.18, SD = 0.71). The EG showed significantly higher mathematics achievement than the CG, demonstrating the effectiveness of games and simulations in learning (p<0.05). Additionally, a strong positive correlation (r = 0.96) was found between students’ perceptions of games and simulations and their mathematics achievement. The study concludes with implications and recommendations for future research.

Education aims to enhance students’ mathematical abilities in alignment with the demands of the 21st century. Essential to these contemporary skills are the 4C competencies, among which is the capacity for creative thinking - a fundamental skill enabling students to critically analyze problems and devise various innovative solutions. This study endeavors to assess whether the application of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) combined with Augmented Reality (AR) enhances creative thinking abilities more effectively than PjBL alone. Employing a quasi-experimental research design, two distinct classes were subjected to different instructional treatments. The study participants comprised eighth-grade junior high school students, with each class consisting of 140 students, divided into control and experimental groups. The research instrument utilized was a test assessing mathematical creative thinking abilities. Data analysis commenced with prerequisite tests for normality and homogeneity, followed by hypothesis testing using the t-test, facilitated by SPSS 21 software. The findings revealed that that there is an influence on students’ creative thinking abilities in using PjBL using AR than PjBL without AR. This underscores the efficacy of Augmented Reality (AR) media in cultivating the creative thinking abilities of junior high school students, particularly in geometric contexts. The positive impact of PjBL augmented with AR can be attributed to the immersive nature of AR technology, which encourages students to engage creatively with projects, thereby enhancing their capacity for innovative problem-solving.

Teachers’ knowledge and skills in assessment are important factors for improving the practice of Classroom Assessment (CA), which is a vital component of teaching and learning. There is ample research attempting to ascertain if training can contribute to increasing teachers’ knowledge and skills in assessment. In Bangladesh, the new curriculum places significant emphasis on classroom assessment compared to summative assessment. This study aims to answer the following questions: What is the status of Classroom Assessment Literacy (CAL) among primary school teachers in Bangladesh? What is the relationship between teachers’ training in assessment and their CAL? And what factors do teachers believe affect the translation of training in CA into CAL? The study followed a mixed-method research approach. Initially, quantitative data on teachers’ CAL and their training in CA were collected from 100 primary school teachers in Dhaka city using a CAL Test. Based on the results of this test, eight teachers with different combinations of CAL levels and training were interviewed. The results showed that the mean score of the sample of primary school teachers was above the middle score but still not high. Their mean score varied across different components of the test. For example, teachers were found to be most competent in using assessment data to make decisions and least competent in selecting appropriate assessment tools. We found that the more hours of training in assessment the teachers had, the lower they scored on the CAL test. However, this relationship was weak. We also found that having a Master of Education (MEd) degree can make a significant difference in their CAL test score. Teachers with more years of experience appeared to score lower on the test and vice versa (though not statistically significant). Qualitative data revealed that each teacher followed their own unique CA styles with a combination of different CA techniques, and there was no pattern based on teachers’ CAL test scores. However, teachers with higher CAL test scores seemed to provide feedback to their students in a more descriptive and meaningful way than teachers with lower CAL test scores. Data revealed that training is one of the sources of teachers’ knowledge and skills in CA among others. However, various enabling and deterring factors work together to determine the effectiveness of training in bringing about sustainable change in teachers’ knowledge and skills in CA. Among many factors, the “one shot” and “one size fits all” design of the trainings were found to be ineffective by teachers who have unique classroom contexts. Additionally, teachers’ own perceptions of training, the school environment, and context are also factors that affect the translation of training in CA into sustainable CAL that they can apply in practice.