Applications of Rasch Measurement in Research and Practice

Applications of Rasch Measurement in Research and Practice

Zi Yan zyan@eduhk.hk Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong, China)
Summary: 
A growing number of studies utilising the Rasch model have been published, spanning various disciplines. This paper delves into five key domains where Rasch measurement is applied, namely: developing new instruments, creating short-form instruments, developing vertical scales, combining Rasch analysis and path analysis, and applications to classroom testing. Within each area, this paper presents research studies as illustrations of how Rasch measurement can effectively address measurement issues and advance practices. These studies provide concrete examples for reflection, highlighting typical procedures and potential pitfalls to avoid when employing the Rasch model for different purposes in diverse contexts.
Keywords: 
Rasch Measurement
Rasch model in Research
Rasch model in practice.
Refers: 

[1] Aryadoust, V., Tan, H.A.H., & Ng, L.Y. (2019). A Scientometric review of Rasch measurement: The rise and progress of a speciality. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2197.

[2] Bond, T., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2020). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. (4th ed) London: Routledge.

[3] Linacre, J. M. (2011). Winsteps (Version 3.72.3) [Computer Software]. Chicago: Winsteps.com.

[4] Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.

[5] Yan, Z. (2018). The self-assessment practice scale (SaPS) for students: Development and psychometric studies. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0371-8

[6] Yan, Z. (2020). Developing a short form of the selfassessment practices scale: Psychometric evidence. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 153. https://doi. org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00153

[7] Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247-1262. https://doi.org/10.1080 /02602938.2016.1260091

[8] Yan, Z., Brown, G. T., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L. (2020). Student self-assessment: Why do they do it? Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509-532. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038

[9] Yan, Z., Lau, D. C. H., & Mok, M. M. C. (2013). A concurrent-separate approach to vertical scaling. In M. M. C. Mok (Ed.), Self-directed Learning Oriented Assessments in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 187-201). Springer

Articles in Issue