[1] Arnold, J., Boone, W., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2018). Assessment of competencies in scientific inquiry through the application of Rasch measurement techniques. Education Sciences, 8(4), 184. https://doi: 10.3390/educsci8040184
[2] Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
[3] Banks, G., Clinchot, M., Cullipher, S., Huie, R., Lambertz, J., Lewis, R., Ngai, C., Sevian, H., Szteinberg, G., Talanquer, V., & Weinrich, M. (2015). Uncovering chemical thinking in students’ decision making: A fuel-choice scenario. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1610-1618. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. jchemed.5b00119
[4] Barbera, J. (2013). A psychometric analysis of the Chemical Concepts Inventory. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3004353
[5] Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2003). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40(2), 185–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003. tb01103.x
[6] Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[7] Boone, W. (2016). Rasch Analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), rm4. https://doi: 10.1187/ cbe.16-04-0148
[8] Boone, W. J., & Noltemeyer, A. (2017). Rasch analysis: A primer for school psychology researchers and practitioners. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org /10.1080/2331186x.2017.1416898
[9] Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests. Science Education, 90(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20106\
[10] Carvalho, I., Borges, Á. D. L., & Bernardes, L. S. C. (2005). Medicinal chemistry and molecular modeling: An integration to teach drug structure-activity relationship and the molecular basis of drug action. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 588. https:// doi.org/10.1021/ed082p588
[11] Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
[12] Cicchetti, D. V. (2001). Methodological commentary the precision of reliability and validity estimates revisited: Distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(5), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.5.695.1249
[13] Davidowitz, B., & Potgieter, M. (2016). Use of the Rasch measurement model to explore the relationship between content knowledge and topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge for organic chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1483–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016. 1196843
[14] Deng, Y., & Wang, H. (2017). Research on evaluation of Chinese students’ competence in written scientific argumentation in the context of Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00076b
[15] Enke, C. G. (2001). The science of chemical analysis and the technique of mass spectrometry. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 212(1-3), 1–11. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s1387-3806(01)00500-0
[16] Fiedler, D., Sbeglia, G. C., Nehm, R. H., & Harms, U. (2019). How strongly does statistical reasoning influence knowledge and acceptance of evolution? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21547
[17] Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement: Lawshe’s content validity index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 530- 531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002
[18] Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2017). Investigating a learning progression for energy ideas from upper elementary through high school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 68–93. https:// doi:10.1002/tea.21411
[19] Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi: 10.2307/2529310
[20] Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2021). Development and validation of a rating scale for summarization as an integrated task. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40862-021-00113-6
[21] Linacre, J. M. (2011). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS/ MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com
[22] Linacre, J. M. (2012). Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Facets Tutorial. Retrieved on 15th February 2023 from http://winsteps.com/tutorials.htm
[23] Maeng, S. (2020). Investigating a learning progression for reasoning practices of geocognition using geomapappbased assessment. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(2), 584–614. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177- bja10009
[24] McHugh, M. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 276-282. https://doi: 10.11613/bm.2012.031
[25] Nedungadi, S., Paek, S. H., & Brown, C. E. (2019). Utilizing Rasch analysis to establish the psychometric properties of a concept inventory on concepts important for developing proficiency in organic reaction mechanisms. Chemistry Teacher International. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0004
[26] Ngai, C., Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). What is this substance? What makes it different? Mapping progression in students’ assumptions about chemical identity. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2438–2461. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069 3.2014.927082
[27] Ngai, C. L. (2017). An investigation of chemical identity thinking. Graduate Doctoral Dissertations. 336. http:// scholarworks.umb.edu/doctoral_dissertations/336
[28] Ngai, C., & Sevian, H. (2016). Capturing chemical identity thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 137– 148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00387
[29] Ngai, C., & Sevian, H. (2018). Probing the relevance of chemical identity thinking in biochemical contexts. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(4), ar58. https://doi. org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0271
[30] Oon, P.-T., Spencer, B. & Kam, C.C. (2016). Psychometric quality of a student evaluation of teaching survey in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), pp. 788–800. https://doi.org /10.1080/02602938.2016.1193119.
[31] Planinic, M., Boone, W., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2). https://doi: 10.1103/ physrevphyseducres.15.020111
[32] Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi:10.1002/ nur.20147
[33] Reed, C. R., & Wolfson, A. J. (2021). Concept inventories as a complement to learning progressions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/ cbe.20-09-0208
[34] Sanah, N.U., Ridwan, A., & Rahmawati, A. (2019). Analysis of chemical identity thinking through problembased learning based on redox and electrochemistry concepts. In Empowering Science and Mathematics for Global Competitiveness. (pp363-368). CRS pess.
[35] Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00111c
[36] Wei, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, X. (2012). Using Rasch measurement to develop a computer modelingbased instrument to assess students’ conceptual understanding of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ed100852t
[37] Van Regenmortel, M. H. (2004). Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology. EMBO reports, 5(11), 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/ sj.embor.7400284
[38] Yao, J.-X., & Guo, Y.-Y. (2017). Validity evidence for a learning progression of scientific explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21420
[39] Zarkadis, N., Papageorgiou, G., & Stamovlasis, D. (2017). Studying the consistency between and within the student mental models for atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00135e