Abbitt, J. T., & Boone, W. J. (2021). Gaining insight from survey data: An analysis of the community of inquiry survey using Rasch measurement techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, pp. 33, 367-397. DOI: 0.1007/s12528-020-09268-6
 Abedin, N. F. Z, Jaafar, Z., Husain, S., & Abdullah, R. (2013). The validity of ASSIST as a measurement of learning approach among MDAB students. Procedia – Social Behavioral Sciences, 90, 549-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.125
 Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D. D., & Hungi, N. (2005). Our experiences and conclusion. In S. Alagumalai, D. D. Curtis, & N. Hungi (Eds.), Applied Rasch measurement: A book of exemplars (pp. 343-346). Netherlands: Springer.
 Bailes, L. P., & Nandakumar, R. (2020). Get the most from your survey: An application of Rasch analysis for education leaders. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 16(2), 1-19. DOI: 10.22230/ ijepl.2020v16n2a857
 Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
 Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In J. Biggs & D. Watkins (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45-67). Hong Kong/Melbourne, Vic.: Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.
 Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2004). Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: A research note. Accounting Education, 13(4), 449-459. DOI: 10.1080/0963928042000306792
 Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 203-221. DOI10.1348/000709904X22683
 Diseth, A. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381-394. DOI: 10.1080/00313830120096789
 Duff, A. (1997). A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle & Tait’s Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 529-539. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01263.x
 Duff, A. (2004). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its use in management education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 56-72. DOI: 10.1177/1469787404040461
 Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching: an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers: John Wiley & Sons.
 Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning: Crook Helm Ltd.
 Enwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201-204.
 Entwistle, N. J. (1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding. In B. C. Dart & G. M. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 72-101). Camberwell, Melbourne, Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
 Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper presented at the TLRP Conference, Leicester.
 Entwistle, N. J. (2001). ASSIST. Retrieved on 12 May from: http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/questionnaires/ ASSIST.pdf.
 Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an Approach to Studying Inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33-48.
 Fan, J., & Bond, T. (2019). Applying Rasch measurement in language assessment: Unidimensionality and local independence. In V. Aryadoust, & M. Raquel (Eds.), Quantitative data analysis for language assessment volume I (pp. 83-102). London: Routledge.
 Gadelrab, H. F. (2011). Factor structure and predictive validity of Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) in Egypt: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1197-1218.
 Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, M. H., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462- 482. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
 Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2012). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2012.733689
 Leeming, P, & Harris, J. (2022). Measuring foreign students’ self-determination: A Rasch validation study. Language Learning, 72(3), 646-694. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12496
 Li, J., & Chun, C. K. (2012). Effects of learning strategies on student reading literacy performance. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 12(1), 30- 38.
 Linacre, J. M. (2023). A User’s Guide to Winsteps, Minister, Rasch-Model Computer Programs, Program Manual 5.4.3. Retrieved on May 5th from: https://www. winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf
 Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. DOI: 10.1111/ j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
 Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: II – Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115–127. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044- 8279.1976.tb02304.x
 McCune, V., & Entwistle, N. (2000). The deep approach to learning: Analytic abstraction and idiosyncratic development. Paper presented at the Innovations in Higher Education Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
 McInerney, D. M., Cheng, R. W.-y., Mok, M. M. C., & Lam, A. K. H. (2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: Direction of effect on student academic achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 249-269. DOI: 10.1177/1932202X12451020
 Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15 (2). DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020111
 Ramsden, P. (1985). Student learning research: Retrospect and prospect. Higher Education Research and Development, 4(1), 51-69. DOI: 10.1080/0729436850040104
 Robershaw, K. L., Bradley, K. D., & Waddington, R. J. (2022). Parents’ awareness and perspectives of school choice scale: Psychometric evidence using Rasch modelling. Journal of School Choice, 16(2), 275-305. DOI: 10.1080/15582159.2021.2004493
 Simelana-Mnisi, S., & Mji, A. (2017). Establishing the reliability and validity of the ASSIST questionnaire: A South African sample perspective. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(1), 201- 223.
 Speth, C. A., Namuth, D. M., & Lee, D. J. (2007). Using the ASSIST short-form for evaluating an information technology application: Validity and reliability issues. Informing Science Journal, 10, 107-119.
 Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
 Valadas, S. C. A., Gonçalves, F. R., & Faísca, L. M. (2010). Approaches to studying in higher education Portuguese students: a Portuguese version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students. Higher Education, 59, 259-275.
 Webb, G. (1997). Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education, 33(2), 195-212.