[1] Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
[2] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
[3] Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
[4] Campbell, E. (2003). The ethical teacher. Open University Press.
[5] Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, m6890. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.m6890
[6] Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2012). Self-efficacy, job satisfaction, motivation and commitment: Exploring the relationships between indicators of teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0069-2
[7] Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.
[8] Day, C., & Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotional contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16(1), 7–23. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14681360701877743
[9] Drago-Severson, E. (2012). New opportunities for principal leadership: Shaping school climates for enhanced teacher development. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–44. https://doi. org/10.1177/016146811211400305
[10] Duan, H., & Zhao, W. (2024). The effects of educational artificial intelligence-powered applications on teachers’ perceived autonomy, professional development for online teaching, and digital burnout. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7659
[11] Feser, M. S., & Haak, I. (2023). Key features of teacher identity: A systematic meta-review study with special focus on teachers of science or science related subjects. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 287–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267 .2022.2108644
[12] Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
[13] Ghiasvand, F., & Seyri, H. (2025). A collaborative reflection on the synergy of artificial intelligence (AI) and language teacher identity reconstruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 160, 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105022
[14] Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221 239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793
[15] Hallinger, P., Liu, S., & Niu, X. (2025). Cultural context, principal instructional leadership, and teacher efficacy: A meta-analytic review, 1989 2024. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. https:// doi.org/10.1177/17411432251349810
[16] Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742 051X(98)00025-0
[17] Ho, F. M. (2018). Reforms in pedagogy and the Confucian tradition: looking below the surface. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9795-8
[18] Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291.
[19] Lan, Y. (2024). Through tensions to identity-based motivations: Exploring teacher professional identity in artificial intelligence-enhanced teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736
[20] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
[21] Liên, N. T., Hằng, N. V. T., & Hằng, N. T. (2025). Vietnamese teachers’ career adaptability in implementing the 2018 competency-oriented curriculum: A case within a Confucian heritage culture. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2554951. https:// doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2554951
[22] Lin, Y., Jiang, Y., & Lei, J. (2025). Generative AI and teacher professional identity development: A case study on L2 Chinese reading materials development. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/095882 21.2025.2592620
[23] Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General education curriculum (Issued with Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT dated December 26, 2018). https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao duc/Thong-tu-32-2018-TT-BGDDT-ban-hanh Chuong-trinh-giao-duc-pho-thong-403031.aspx
[24] Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
[25] Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
[26] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.n71
[27] Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2017.06.013
[28] Postholm, M. B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1522781. https://doi. org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.15227
[29] Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
[30] Rethlefsen, M. L., & Page, M. J. (2022). PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: Common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
[31] Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., & Koffel, J. B. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
[32] Saunders, R. (2013). The role of teacher emotions in change: Experiences, patterns and implications for professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 14(3), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10833-012-9195-0
[33] Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
[34] Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059 1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
[35] Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355
[36] Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
[37] UNESCO. (2024). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391116
[38] Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.