This study examined the attitudes of Class 10 students in western Bhutan regarding the interpersonal behavior of their Geography teachers and the correlation between these perceptions and their motivation to learn the subject. A convergent parallel mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating survey questions, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions. The study was conducted at 22 secondary schools across five Dzongkhags, involving 303 students and 26 Geography instructors. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation, while qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis. Students generally rated their instructors positively, with the highest average scores for leadership (M = 4.35), understanding (M = 4.34), and helpfulness/ friendliness (M = 4.16). Uncertainty (M = 1.55) and dissatisfaction (M = 1.83) received the lowest ratings, resulting in an overall teacher behavior score of 3.07. Students were highly motivated to learn Geography (M = 3.80, SD = .52), with grade motivation being the highest (M = 4.11). A statistically significant and moderate correlation was found between perceived teacher behavior and student motivation (r = .472, p = .015). The study suggests that Geography teacher training should emphasize active listening and emotional awareness to enhance classroom interactions and boost student motivation.
[1] Argyle, M. (1994). The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour. Penguin Books.
[2] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human Behavior, 4, 71-81.
[3] Braun, V& Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 98. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[4] Brown, B. L. (2010). The Impact of Self-Efficacy and Motivation Characteristics on the Academic Achievement of Upward Bound Participants [Unpublished Ph.D thesis]. The University of Southern Mississippi.
[5] Creswell, John W; & Cresswell, J Devid;. (2018). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches( 5th ed). SAGE Publication.
[6] Deci, E. & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
[7] Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., Levy, J., & Wubbels, T. (2002). Diagnosing and improving the quality of teachers’ interpersonal behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(4), 176– 184. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540210432155
[8] Den Brok, P.D., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbles, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. Schools Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(4), 407-442. 10.1080/09243450512331383262
[9] Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., & Koul, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for secondary science students’ attitudes in Kashmir. Journal of classroom interaction, 40(2), 5-19
[10] Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., & Scott, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 765–779. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038488
[11] Den Brok, P. D., Levy, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbles, T. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students’ subject-specific motivation. Journal of Classroom interaction, 40(2), 20-33. http://www. jstor.org/stable/23870661
[12] Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Rickards, T. (2006). Secondary Teachers’ Interpersonal Behaviour in Singapore, Brunei and Australia: A cross-national comparison. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 79–95. https://doi. org/10.1080/02188790600608208
[13] De Brok, P.D, Fisher, D & Scott, R. (2011). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 765-779.
[14] Depersio, G. (2021). Using Simple Random Sample to Study Larger Populations. The investopedia express podcast. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042915/ what-are-advantages-using-simple-random-samplestudy-larger-population.asp
[15] Flammer, A. (2015). Self-Efficacy. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 4(1994), 504–508. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25033-2
[16] Fraser. B.J and Goh. S.C, (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in singapore, Kluwer Academic Publishers georgiou, M., & Kyriakides, L. (2012). The impact of teacher and principal interpersonal behaviour on student learning outcomes. Interpersonal Relationship in Education, 119-135.
[17] Georgiou, M & Kyriakides, L. (2012). The impact of teacher and principal interpersonal behaviour on student learning outcomes. Interpersonal Relationship in Education,3, 119- 133. https://link.springer.com/ chapter/10.1007/978-94-6091-939-8_8
[18] Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/ tea.20442
[19] Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and students outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning environment research, 1, 199-229.
[20] Husain, U. K. (2014, December 10-11). Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation. International Conference on Economics, Education and Humanities (ICEEH’14), Bali, Indonesia. https:// doi.org/10.15242/icehm.ed1214132
[21] J-F. Gyamtsho, S., Swabey. K., & Pullen, D. (2015, Nov.29). Capturing the voices of schools drop-outs in Bhutan [paper presentation]. Conference proceeding of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/296294812CAPTURI NGTHE_VOICES_OF_SCHOOL_DROPOUTS_ IN_BHUTAN/link/56d40a3808aed25c3de98861/ download.
[22] Jamtsho, S. (2004). Attitude of Teachers in Junior High Schools in Bhutan. RABSEL the CERD Educational Journal, 4, (pp. 5-14). Centre for Educational Research and Development.
[23] London, M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 620–630. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284664
[24] Martin, A.J. (2014). Interpersonal relationships and students’ academic and non-academic development: What outcomes peers, parents, and teachers do and do not impact. In D. Zandvliet., P. den Brok., T. Mainhard., & J. Tartwijk (Eds). Interpersonal relationships in education: From theory to practice (pp. 1-9). Rotterdam: Sense.
[25] Martin, A. J. & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yield for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327-365. 10.3102/0034654308325583
[26] Omozele, B. (2017). Learners’ perception of teachers’ interpersonal behaviour as a predictor of academic achievement in junior secondary school certificate examination of Edo State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(20), 144-151. .www.iiste. org
[27] Opdenakker, R (2006). Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research [ElectronicJournal],Volume(7). https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/48666088_ Advantages_and_Disadvantages
[28] Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
[29] Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
[30] Shin, S., Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2017). Influence of career motivation on science learning in Korean high-school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a
[31] Sullivan, H. S. (1953) Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry. Psychiatry, 3(1), 1-117. 10.1080/00332747.1940.11022272
[32] Telli, S. (2016): Students’ perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal behaviour across four different school subjects: control is good but affiliation is better, Teachers and Teaching. Teachers and teaching theory and practice, 1-16. 10.1080/13540602.2016.1158961
[33] Telli, S., den Brok, P., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Teacherstudent interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Turkey. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 42(1), 31-40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23869791
[34] Warsani, H., & Ruhimat, M. (2016). The Effect of Interest and Motivation in Learning Geography Towards Spatial Intelligence of Senior High School Students in Kuantan Singingi Regency. 79, 300–305. https://doi. org/10.2991/icge-16.2017.57
[35] Wijayanto, P. A., Utaya, S., & Astina, I. K. (2017). Increasing student’s motivation and geography learning outcome using active debate method assisted by ISpring Suite. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, 4(4), 240–247. https:// doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v4i4.18336
[36] Yildirim, T. (2017). An examination of high school social science students’ levels motivation towards learning Geography. International Education Studies, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n7p1
[37] Zandvliet, D., den Brok, P., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2014). Interpersonal relationship on education: From theory to practice. Sense publisher.