[1] Alzahrani, F. (2023). Is it true they negatively engage? Mixed method research of student engagement in EFL online classrooms. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.17323/ jle.2023.13736
[2] Artino, A. R., La Rochelle, J. S., Dezee, K. J., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463–474. https://doi.org/ 10.3109/0142159x.2014.889814
[3] Aubrey, S. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.4
[4] Aubrey, S., King, J., & Almukhaild, H. (2020). Language learner engagement during speaking tasks: A longitudinal study. RELC Journal, 53(3), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220945418
[5] Bantawtook, P. (2021). Task engagement in higher education [Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University]. https://doi.org/10.7273/000002403
[6] Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Engagement with the language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–239). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[7] Bergdahl, N., & Hietajärvi, L. (2022). Social engagement in distance, remote, and hybrid learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(3), 315–342. https:// doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14587.80166
[8] Bonvin, G., & Sanchez, E. (2017). Social engagement in a digital role-playing game dedicated to classroom management. In J. Dias, P. Santos, & R. Veltkamp (Eds.), Games and learning alliance: GALA 2017 (Vol. 10653, pp. 138–147). Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-71940-5_13
[9] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi. org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[10] Chen, W., Liu, D., & Lin, C. (2023). Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioural, cognitive, and social engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1078141. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2023.1078141
[11] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
[12] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
[13] Dao, P., & Sato, M. (2021). Exploring fluctuations in the relationship between learners’ positive emotional engagement and their interactional behaviours. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 972–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044238
[14] Dao, P., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., Duong, P., & Tran, T. V. (2021). Learners’ engagement in L2 computer mediated interaction: Chat mode, interlocutor familiarity, and text quality. Modern Language Journal, 105(4), 767–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/ modl.12737
[15] Dewi, N. A., & Oktapiani, W. (2024). Sociocultural theory implications and applications in modern pedagogy. Allemania, 14(1), 47–56. https://doi. org/10.17509/alm.v14i1.71603
[16] Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, Questionnaires in second T. (2009). language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
[17] Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
[18] Estaji, M., & Shojakhanlou, M. M. (2023). Engagement in initiation, response, and feedback in L2 classroom interactions. Discourse and Interaction, 16(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2023-1-70
[19] Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
[20] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543074001059
[21] Goodmacher, G., & Kajiura, A. (2010). Collaborative and communicative reading. Polyglossia, 18, 25 30. https://en.apu.ac.jp/rcaps/page/content0056. html/
[22] Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403 418). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[23] Hall, J. K. (2010). Interaction as method and result of language learning. Language Teaching, 43(2), 202 215. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444809005722
[24] Helou, M. M., & Newsome, L. K. (2018). Application of Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach to foster students’ understanding and learning performance. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 2(4), 347.
[25] Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2015.09.005
[26] Hiromori, T. (2021). Anatomizing students’ task engagement in pair work in the language classroom. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 3(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.52598/ jpll/3/1/5
[27] Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
[28] Hiver, P., Dao, P., & Yamazaki, J. S. (2025). L2 task engagement: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0261444825101043
[29] Hunsu, N., Simmons, D. R., Brown, S. A., & Adesope, O. (2018). Developing an instrument of classroom social engagement [Paper presentation]. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2- 30298
[30] Jin, T., Jiang, Y., Gu, M. M., & Chen, J. (2022). “Their encouragement makes me feel more confident”: Exploring peer effects on learner engagement in collaborative reading of academic texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60, 101177. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101177
[31] Kearney, E., & Ahn, S. (2014). Preschool world language learners’ engagement with language: What are the possibilities? Language Awareness, 23(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416 .2013.804831
[32] Kołsut, S., & Szumilas, M. (2023). Exploring student engagement in task-based and communicative language classrooms. Language Teaching Research. org/10.1177/13621688231188800
[33] Lambert, C., & Zhang, G. (2019). Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as foreign languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12560
[34] Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362168816683559
[35] Li, J., Chen, M., & Zheng, Q. (2024). The dynamics and mediating factors of students’ emotional and social engagement in a project-based writing course. System, 121, 103237. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103237
[36] Lutz, S. L., Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary school reading instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/ JOER.100.1.3-20
[37] Moranski, K., & Toth, P. D. (2016). Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. In M. Sato & S. G. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 291–316). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.12mor
[38] Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., Bielak, J., & Wiertelak, W. (2025). Unveiling the dynamics of learner engagement: An idiodynamic investigation of L2 speaking tasks. Applied Linguistics. https://doi. org/10.1093/applin/amaf071
[39] Nguyen, V. L., & Dang, T. K. T. (2022). Engaging EFL learners in reading: A text-driven approach to improve reading performance. TESL-EJ, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26102a5
[40] Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1 4614-2018-7_12
[41] Phan, H. L. T., & Dao, P. (2023). Engagement in collaborative writing: Exploring learners’ control of task content and text quality. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12462
[42] Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
[43] Phung, L. (2017). Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 751 766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683561
[44] Phung, L., Nakamura, S., & Reinders, H. (2020). The effect of choice on affective engagement: Implications for task design. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 163–181). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22730722.14
[45] Rogers, L., & Zemach, D. E. (2018). Skillful reading & writing 3: Student’s book B2. Macmillan Education.
[46] Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-method examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179.
[47] Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, A. H., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-mediated communication and student engagement: A review of current research and implications for instruction. Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s41239-017-0063-0
[48] Smith, J. G., Knight, J. K., Gilman, H., & Pollock, S. J. (2018). In-class observed engagement and its relationship to self-reported engagement and academic performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/ cbe.17-03-0046
[49] Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114.
[50] Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 242–258. https://doi. org/10.1080/09658410903197264
[51] Torche, F., & Valenzuela, E. (2011). Trust and reciprocity: A theoretical distinction of the sources of social capital. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(2), 181–198. https://doi. org/10.1177/1368431011403461
[52] Toth, P. D., Wagner, E., & Moranski, K. (2013). “Co constructing” explicit L2 knowledge with high school Spanish learners through guided induction. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278. https://doi. org/10.1093/applin/ams049
[53] Waters, J., & Gasson, S. (2006). Social engagement in an online community of inquiry [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2006), Milwaukee, WI, United States.
[54] Wentzel, K. R. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and adolescent competence at school. In T. Wubbels, P. den Brok, J. van Tartwijk, & J. Mainhard (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 19 35). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 94-6091-939-8_2
[55] Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
[56] Yawiloeng, R. (2021). Peer scaffolding during EFL reading activities: A sociocultural perspective. English Language Teaching, 14(12), 44. https:// doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n12p44
[57] Zare, J., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Task engagement in second language acquisition: A questionnaire development and validation study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2306166
[58] Zhang, B. (2021). Engaging in dialogue during collaborative writing: The role of affective, cognitive, and social engagement. Language Teaching Research, 29(1), 33–62. https://doi. org/10.1177/13621688211054047